pjthompson: (0)
pjthompson ([personal profile] pjthompson) wrote 2008-07-31 06:17 pm (UTC)

I don't buy most of what Tannen is selling

No, I'm not fond of cultural appropriation for the purpose of shoehorning it into a pet theory. It smacks of imperialism.

Interest post, btw. I think tricksters are generally important figures, not just clowns and cultural taboos personified. Chaos theory personified, if they must be a personification, the power waiting just beneath the surface of the world to rip away that surface and be transformed into something new. Bad for individuals living in a particular time and place, but the way in which change happens.

I got the Landay book a day or two after Tannen arrived and I'm also looking for Scheherezade's Sisters and rereading Hyde. You might want to add Aunt Nancy from African-American folklore to your list, as well as Baubo/Iambe from Greek myth. Those last two also give you a nice triad goddesss thing if you're looking for it: Iambe/maiden, Demeter/mother, Baubo/crone.

As to Lilith, I think she has trickster implications. She's much degraded in Judeo-Christian tradition and what appeals to me about her as a feminine icon is what scraps one can glean about her from a broader Mess o'potamian perspective: her associations with Inanna, et al. Even within the Judeo-Christian context, her independence and her refusal to be submissive and/or ungratified and unimportant is appealing. I view that whole demon thing as propoganda for trying to keep uppity women in place. Of course they have to downgrade her to demon. She questions their grip on power.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting