pjthompson: (Default)
pjthompson ([personal profile] pjthompson) wrote2010-08-05 03:05 pm
Entry tags:

Lush and overwritten

So, what is the difference for you between lush prose and overwritten prose?

I’m not asking to be a smart aleck or because I have an ax to grind (I don’t), I’m genuinely curious what the breaking point is for any of you who would care to comment.

I know that one person’s lush is another’s overwritten and vice versa, so some of it is a matter of taste, but I’d still like to hear your thoughts on this if you’re willing.

For myself, yeah, I do sometimes hit a wall with some lush prose where I want very badly for the author to tone it down several notches. Usually for me it involves the use of a lot of two dollar words when simpler ones would flow better, but it can also involve a great deal of artery-clogging images piled one on top of another. Still, other people lap that kind of thing up like cream—arteries be damned.

There probably isn’t a consensus. But, please, discuss…

Mirrored from Better Than Dead.

[identity profile] darkspires.livejournal.com 2010-08-06 04:28 am (UTC)(link)
Lush for me is when a theme is chosen. Frex, dry. All the words in a piece are focused on conveying dryness in subtle ways.

Overwritten, purple prose is multiple qualifiers in every sentence to convey the same theme. If it reads over the top and down the other side, then it is.