pjthompson: (Default)
[personal profile] pjthompson
Reading over later chapters of Venus In Transit to get back into the story I realize that once again I'm suffering from Stick Figure Villain syndrome. My first drafts often have this problem, and I have to work extra hard to give some dimension to my baddies. Either that, or I go too far in the other way: I give them so much backstory and motivation that I fall in love with them and want to make them the hero of their own story.

Some Famous Writer (who I can't remember at the moment) once said, "Every villain is the hero of their own story." Or maybe it was a Famous Actor. (Anyone know who this is?) Regardless, it's true. The villain, in order to be truly dimensional, has to feel perfectly justified in their actions.

I think my most successful villains to date were three novels ago in Shivery Bones. I fell so in love with Annia Sabina from that novel that I've got to write a novel from her POV. I already wrote a key scene as a novella from her eyes and loved every second of it. One of the great things about her was that she walked on stage fully formed, declared herself bad and completely unrepentant. How can you not love that? Even Duke Chavez, the ultimate bad guy of that novel, turned sympathetic in key scenes, but I had to work extra hard to get him there. He was the stickiest of stick villains at first.

It required me asking the question, "What made him so bad?" and diving in there to rut around. It's too easy to say, "He's crazy." He was crazy, but how did he get there? It's too easy to say, "He was born that way." Some bad people are—bad seeds from the start. But most bad people are made, I think, either through social factors or family factors, or both. How was Duke made bad? Once you put yourself into the six-year-old incarnation of your bad guy, allow yourself to see, experience, feel what he did when he was too young to defend himself, how can you ever despise him again? If you're doing it right, I don't think you can. You can despise what they've become, despise the things they do, but I think you should still retain some sympathy for that little kid who was so badly bent. Then, I believe, you're on the cusp of creating a true villain, one with shadings and hidden nooks in which they are the hero of their own story.

I imagine I'll whip the current stick villains into a better place in subsequent drafts. The villain from novel before last still needs some work, is still doing too much mustache-twirling and foot stamping. I've gone a little ways into the shady nooks of that character, but not far enough. It's a murky pool to dive into, full of unpleasant weeds that cling to my legs, and at the bottom it's possible I'll find a shiny rock that—if it had been formed under different kinds of pressure—might have turned into a diamond.

Date: 2008-12-21 05:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kimberlychapman.livejournal.com
Personally, I don't think villains tend to be well-written unless the writer has had at least a bit of a romp through their heads. Any villain written without any glimpse from their POV is bound to end up a caricature.

What I also find particularly interesting is when readers chastise writers when good guys do immoral things, as if in allowing an otherwise good person to commit a bad act, the writer is condoning said act. I've got characters who are basically good but do/say things that I most certainly would never do or approve of, but that's because I try to make it so they're not all me-clones.

In my reading, my favourite characters are the ones where you have trouble figuring out if they're a good guy or a bad guy, and not in the cheesy, overdone way of having the adventurer hero who is rough around the edges or stuff like that. I love ambiguity, where flawed people do flawed things but aren't necessarily evil.

My favourite evil characters in things I've read/seen are the ones who don't take themselves seriously about it. Mocking their own evil...that's awesome when pulled off well...

Date: 2008-12-23 03:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kmkibble75.livejournal.com
Despite what Alfred says in The Dark Knight, very few men just want to see the world burn. They all need a reason for doing what it is they're doing, no matter what it is. And I think that's what makes or breaks the bad guys -- nobody ever wakes up and thinks, "Man, I'm evil. Look at me being all evil in my pajamas..." Like you say that other person said, they're the hero in their story. The best ones, I think, always believe they're making the world a better place and will fight the protagonist to the death to do what they think is right.

Date: 2008-12-26 01:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kmkibble75.livejournal.com
Exactly... and to beat the Dark Knight angle a little more, even in that movie, the Joker had clear goals and motivation -- he thought he was making the world a better place by creating a little anarchy. So, in some cases, even the psychotics have that. :-)

Date: 2008-12-26 02:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kmkibble75.livejournal.com
Wow... yeah. That'd be pretty tough to explain.

Date: 2008-12-26 03:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kmkibble75.livejournal.com
I haven't watched the new today... that's unbelievable.

Profile

pjthompson: (Default)
pjthompson

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4 567 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728 293031

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 07:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios