I think I generally get a what-if scenario first. "What if someone could spin a thread from their own blood?" Then I try to find out what that means. Why would someone be doing that? Who would be doing that? And then I see if there's a drama, an actual plot, to go along with the scenario. If there is, and if, as I spin it out in my mind, I like it, then it might make a story one day.
I guess that's not the *only* way I start stories, but that's a common way.
This question came up in a memorial for Kage Baker. Someone said she built her stories in a style more reminiscent of the English school of acting: get the setting, clothing, world in place then build a character to fit--outside in. They went on to say most Americans have been taught to build the character first, then add the outward trimmings, and I thought, is that right? I think I land somewhere in the middle.
Yeah, I'm somewhere in the middle. Generally, the character and situation arrive together, and then I piece the story together. Not always. Sometimes worldbuilding explodes in my head and then I figure it out, but usually it's what you said.
See my answer to asakiyume, above. Characters are really strong from the first, but they often come with worldbuilding and plot attached. Then it becomes a matter of really getting to know the character, and that adds to the plot and worldbuilding. I'm beginning to realize that theme plays a more important part in my writing than I'd previously thought. I haven't got a prayer of finishing something if I don't have at least an inkling, at least instinctually, of the substrata of the story.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 11:42 pm (UTC)I guess that's not the *only* way I start stories, but that's a common way.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-11 11:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-12 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-12 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-12 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-12 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-12 10:23 pm (UTC)