Planet

Jul. 10th, 2019 12:08 pm
pjthompson: quotes (quotei)
Random quote of the day:

“Every novelist ought to invent his own technique, that is the fact of the matter. Every novel worthy of the name is like another planet, whether large or small, which has its own laws just as it has its own flora and fauna. Thus, Faulkner’s technique is certainly the best one with which to paint Faulkner’s world, and Kafka’s nightmare has produced its own myths that make it communicable. . . . The work of art itself. . . is the solution to the problem of technique.”

—François Mauriac, La Table Ronde magazine, August 1949



Disclaimer: The views expressed in this random quote of the day do not necessarily reflect the views of the poster, her immediate family, Key and Peele, Celine Dion, or Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. They do, however, sometimes reflect the views of the Cottingley Fairies.

 
pjthompson: parker writing (dorothy)
 

In my current WIP I am weaving together new writing plus a number of short stories set in the same universe. Originally, I had planned to include a 31.5k novella* in this but I second-guessed myself.

“You know,” I told myself, “you could probably use this material for another novel centered around this character.”

So I removed that chunk from the novel.

But, you see, every second guess is worth a second second guess. It occurs to me that the future novel I was thinking of may never get written. Old time is a-flying…and I’m not. Not to mention that the information from that novella needed to go into this novel for the actions/motivations of the characters to make sense.

So I did this ham-handed non-POV retelling in the current novel that just isn’t going to work.

That novella, on the other hand, fits quite handily (ha) into the current work so I’m thinking that maybe I need to spend my coin here rather than save it for a rainy day that in drought-prone Southern California may never happen.

I know it’s not possible for anyone to make a fully informed opinion without reading the piece in question, but I’m wondering all the same if there’s any consensus of opinion on this?

 

 

*For those who may be reading this who have read some of my Dos Lunas pieces, the novella in question is Hortensia’s Man.

pjthompson: (Default)
You may remember a recent post in which I stated that the structure of my novel had begun to resemble a water tower with a big glob of denouement on top of spindly legs. I forced myself to outline all the stuff that needed to be crammed in at the end and come up with a sequence of events that seemed less bulbous. I've been chipping away at it ever since, doing the grown up thing, just grinding it out until I can type The End. This is not the fun part of writing, this is just what you have to do sometimes. It's been a slow, painful process, somewhat resembling this:



Yanno, closing in on the end of my sixth completed novel (sloooooooooowly) I can truly say that every novel is a royal pain in its own way. Whether you outline or not, whether you saturate yourself with research or not, whether you get to know your characters well enough to forge their signatures—or not—it's still going to give you a royal pain somewhere along the line. You think you're starting to get the hang of it after a few of them, and some things are easier, but inevitably, every damned time, you're forced to learn something new.

Or, not you, yanno, necessarily. Maybe that's just me.

I wish it was more like this:



But, alas.

Here's another one, just because it's so frickin' cuuuuuuuuuute.

pjthompson: (Default)
I had a vision the other day of the current structure of my novel, my WIP. It seems most to resemble one of those small town water towers with the long, skinny base and a great big bulge on top—the top being the end of the novel, with all that climaxy stuff and loose ends. I'm working like a frantic thing to cram all that in. But it still looks kind of like this one in Makanda, Illinois:

Photobucket

Only my novel isn't so round and perfect on top. It's more of a big, fat elliptical water tower on a spindly column. I spent way too long on the build up and way too much time on character backstory. (Right about here, those who have been with me on this journey before are saying, "As always.")

Clearly, things cannot be allowed to stand in this shape. Somehow, in the next draft, I'm going to have to push some of that bulge down into base without bursting my bubble or causing the whole rickety structure to collapse.

We wouldn't want that. Think of the carnage if that thing came down on a house. Think of the waste if all those ideas leaked out and inundated the neighborhood. Maybe I can drain them off gradually, reinsert them earlier, so the structure looks more like a really cool rocket:

Photobucket

Then I could lumber into the sky, raining ideas down in fiery sparks. It may not look like it can fly, but just wait until take off. Then you'll see.
pjthompson: (Default)
As I'm stumbling through the first draft of my novels, trying to find the line of the narrative, I have a tendency to throw everything, including the kitchen sink, into the story to see what sticks. This is enormously inefficient, and I wind up having to cut many scenes when it comes to the next draft. But I can never quite seem to see what should stay or what should go until revisions. I'm confused and afraid to throw anything away lest I might need it later.

Classic hoarder mentally. Fortunately, some scenes are so glaringly out of place that I wind up deleting them—but I put them into an "off" file just in case. It's sick. And I suspect it's a big failing because I wind up with big, bloated first drafts that require a lot of rewriting. Although these days they aren't as horribly bloated as they used to be, so maybe I'm learning. Maybe.

In the moment, though, as I'm writing, everything seems vitally important. No one could possibly understand this book without that scene. How can I throw it away? I've gotten a lot better at trusting the reader on the scene and sentence level—really, people can infer quite a bit and "get it" just fine—but I've yet to whip that demon on the plot/book level.

Venus in Transit is having that problem now. Even though I'm writing new material to supposedly replace some of that kitchen sink material, I find it very difficult to throw out the old elements of the structure, characters that could probably be skipped for the sake of streamlining and the drive towards the climax, and etc.

It's a gall-durned cussed streak, that's what it is. Like I said, probably a big failing. I'm working to get beyond it, but I fear sometimes I may need an intervention or a 12-Step program to unlearn these bad habits for good.

Two steps forward, one step back.

Nah—just Keep It Simple, Stupid.
pjthompson: (Default)
There was a good post on the writer's dilemma in regards to publishing at Editorial Ass today. A sympathetic look at the various minefields a writer must consider.

And another good post on writing speed over at Writer Unboxed. There's all kinds of ways to write books, and no right way. What ultmately matters is not how fast or slow, but whether your technique helps you consistently finish books.

Me? I'm thinking a lot about structure these days. I have a twisty mind that comes up with complex stories and sometimes getting it on the page is tough. I think I've got the sentence-level stuff working pretty well; I think I'm doing a pretty good job with characters. My plotting skillz are okay, but could still use some work, I think. But structure--structure structure structure structure structure. That's killing me. I find myself wondering if I'm attempting things that I may not yet be good enough to pull off.

I'm mulling a lot. Thinking, pondering, weighing, sifting.

I suspect this trend will continue.

Meanwhile, the rewrite continues.

A Rain of Angels

Profile

pjthompson: (Default)
pjthompson

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 09:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios