pjthompson: (Default)
Quote of the day:

"It is always best and safest to count on nothing from the Americans but words."

—Neville Chamberlain


For all you Sean Bean fans out there...The Field. I think you have to be pretty hardcore to put up with this one. I saw it at the height of my Sean Bean obsession, and for some reason it popped into my brain today on the drive into work.

This film was clearly designed to be an Important Film, a dramatic high at the end of Richard Harris's career, and consequently has much High Drama and Serious Acting. It also has one of the most ridiculous endings ever which, despite the seriousness I was supposed to be feeling, made me laugh my socks off. Any Monty Python fan would probably feel the same. There is livestock involved. Unfortunately, no French Taunters.

But Seanie has a nice Irish brogue, is gorgeous (of course), is partly a bad boy, partly a lover. Don't get me wrong, this is a seriously droopy film, and although it got some positive critical blah-blah at the time, I thought it mostly overdone and, ultimately, ridiculous. Fast forward through all the bits without Seanie in. But be sure to watch the end.

Oh, and for Sting fans and trivia collectors, Frances Tomelty, his first wife for whom he wrote his stalker song, "I'll Be Watching You," plays a young widow in this flick.


Writingness of the day: I managed to cut only 500 more words yesterday (and sweated to do that much). This portion of saggy middle wasn't as saggy as I remembered. I may have to take another pass through this monster once I finish this one. *sigh* I'll soldier on tomorrow, but I'm going to spend the lunch hour rereading "Eudora" one last time.
pjthompson: (Default)
Cut another 500 words today from more tightly written chapters, for a total of 6,000 words and 24 pages cut. I still have quite a bit of ms. to go, so I'm confident there's another 15k to be gotten rid. Maybe more to make room for the wee bit of a new beginning. That would be really nice.

Crime scene of the day: Well, of tomorrow.

Tomorrow we take Lynn for her birthday treat: a Dearly Departed tour of L.A. murder sites. That should be festive—for a crime aficionado like her. Have to get up early to do it, too, because the normal 1 p.m. tour was sold out. I guess she's not the only one who grooves on the Manson family murders, baby.

Then lunch at the Raymond, a truly nice restaurant in Pasadena, where she lives.

So I'm thinking there won't be much writing or cutting of writing tomorrow. I'm going to let life get in the way for a change. And that's a good thing.
pjthompson: (Default)
Meh. No gain, no cut yesterday. I cut, but had to add in some stuff to make vague things clearer. Clarity is a good thing. I don't begrudge it. The good news is that as I read through this ms. the new opening comes into clearer focus. The set piece I thought I was going to be able to cut from the middle of the ms. and stick on the front probably won't work. I'll have to write something new, but that's forming up. Which will add to the word count, but hopefully not by much. Short is the operative word here: prologue-y short, although I'll call it chapter one because it's in the same time period, et al. The other good news is that these chapters are pretty tight-as-written. I know there's some more baggage coming up in later chapters, but these read pretty well to me, even after all this time.

Today I plan on working on "Eudora's Song." I thought I should probably read it through once more before flinging it at FSF. But I might sneak in more work on Shivery Bones.

ETA: You know what I hate? When you finish a rewrite and you say to yourself, "I think I nailed it that time!" And you lay it aside so you can read it again in a month and gain a little perspective, and you read it a month later and . . . the illusive It remains unnailed. "Eudora" is a stronger story, but the damned middle still sags. I've done what I can for it at this moment in time, but I don't think it's enough. I'm still taking it off the hook and releasing it, though. It needs to get into the water and start swimming. Maybe I'll know better how to fix it the next time I catch it.

Interesting sight of the day: Somebody took out a fire hydrant on Admiralty Way in Marina del Rey. Normally this is a fast shoot winding through the Marina, wending my way from Westchester to Santa Monica. But the opportunities for exiting Admiralty are limited, so we were pretty much trapped there watching the impressive water display. It was shooting up in the air a good 100 feet or so. Since there wasn't a damned thing I could do about it, I went into my zen place and thought about how lucky I was not to be trying to get out of Heathrow today, or flying anywhere for that matter. Finally, the sheriff's department started squeezing cars by in one lane and we eventually merged and moved past.

The merging thing, it's funny. Some drivers are so rabid about being first, even though everyone is moving at a snail's pace. You're not getting ahead of me, you're not getting ahead of me! I'll crash my car into you!" It's chickenshit insane, but what are you going to do? I was in my zen place, so I let the bastard go ahead of me.

Which is not to say I'm not a maniac driver sometimes. It goes with the territory here in L.A. But this morning, apparently, my hormones were in balance and it wasn't a problem. Or maybe it was the lovely fragrance of White Light I smelled for the first time last night.


Quote of the day:

"Fear will always fall to wonder in those who are capable of it."

—Jeffrey Ford, Memoranda
pjthompson: (Default)
Only cut 500 words yesterday, but those were some tight chapters so I felt good about getting rid of even that much. It's nice, too, to reexamine everything with a hard eye. Feels . . . clean.


A significant moment in history of the day: I typed "failure" into Google and the number one position was occupied by the official bio of George W. Bush, President of the United States of America.

And speaking of failures, if "Joementum" Lieberman runs as an Independent as he's threatening, I think we'll wind up with a Republican senator for Connecticut because he'll split the vote too much. Joe's ego is certainly larger than his concern for the electorate.


Quote of the day:

"When I face the desolate impossibility of writing 500 pages, a sick sense of failure falls on me, and I know I can never do it. Then gradually, I write one page and then another. One day's work is all I can permit myself to contemplate."

—John Steinbeck
pjthompson: (Default)
Quotes of the day:

"We are cups, constantly and quietly being filled. The trick is, knowing how to tip ourselves over and let the beautiful stuff out."

—Ray Bradbury


Love this one. He also said one of my favorite quotes about risk-taking and the creative act:

"Throw yourself off a cliff and build your wings on the way down."

He apparently liked that quote, too, for when giving speeches over the years he used several variants:

“Living at risk is jumping off the cliff and building your wings on the way down.”

“Jump, and you will find out how to unfold your wings as you fall.”

"First you jump off the cliff and you build wings on the way down."


I think I prefer the simplicity of the first one. Or maybe I just like that one better because it was the first variant I heard and because it was quoted to me by my departed friend, Stephan. It has become something of a mantra for me in my creative process, anyway.

Writingness of the day:

It's official. I'm going to do another rewrite of Shivery Bones before sending out my next batch of agent queries, see if I can cut 20k. There are a number of things killing me on that book, I suspect, but surely the 143k length is one of them.


SURVEY (as opposed to Monday poll):

How many of you read Evil Editor?
pjthompson: (Default)
You know, it's rather pitiful how much I fretted about my internet connection being up and down all weekend. I knew how bad it had gotten when I actually had the thought yesterday, "At least tomorrow I'll be at work and have a stable connection." And seeing as I live in a third world country, my phone lines won't be fixed until Friday.

"We're so busy because of the rain storms," the repair person said.

Wouldn't you say that a company had spent insufficient funds on infrastructure if every time it rains, massive numbers of phones go out? It never rains in California, as everyone knows. Maybe they were counting on that.

But I digress. This started out to be a positive post about all I accomplished between those times I was obsessively checking the lines for dial tone/connectivity:

➊ I actually got 1,000 words done (for a total of 1250) on a new short story, inspired by the OWW Ghost Challenge—although I doubt seriously I'll finish before the challenge is over. I have the novel to finish, after all, and that's taking up most of my writing time, but it was still fun to write something different. This one might have an actual shot at being a genuine short story, but...

➋ I only got one crit written and posted before the horrific events of no connectivity/OWW server crash.

➌ I updated the 2 page synopsis for Shivery Bones. It's amazing what a little distance will do. I hadn't looked at it for a while and I cut about two paragraphs worth of stuff.

➍ I played in the garden, unpacked more boxes, packed more boxes back up again for the garage sale we're having when the weather clears, did laundry—hardly stimulating but, I'm sure you'll agree, necessary.

➎ I cooked "carnitas" tacos on Saturday and chicken paprikash on Sunday. If I do say so myself, they were pretty good. I bought myself a new slow cooker because I found just the one I wanted on sale last week. A slow cooker?? you may ask yourself in horror. Well, sure. A girl never knows when she might get a hankerin' for cocktail weinies in bourbon barbecue sauce or Superbowl chili. Seriously, I cooked the paprikash in it, and plan to cook arroz con pollo or some Chinese pork next. This ain't your granny's slow cooker.

➏ Saturday morning, before the horrific internet boom and bust began, I introduced my roommate to the wonders of online shopping. I could tell by the gleam in her eye that I may have created a monster. I may have this as a mark against me in the Akashic records. God to Pam: "You got some 'splainin' to do."
pjthompson: (Default)
Quote of the day:

"You only see the tree by the light of the lamp. I wonder when you would ever see the lamp by the light of the tree."

—G. K. Chesterton, The Man Who Was Thursday

Illustrated quote of the day. )

Writing talk of the day: I'm working on chapter 37 now. Chapter 32 has just been posted to the OWW. Major revelation in that chapter (hint). One everyone's been asking me about for months (hint). I'm working steadily towards the end of the book, reaching a rather frightening word count, see much cutting in my future. I already have some ideas about what can go, but I'm not tackling a rewrite for awhile after finishing this monster.

More stuff on new writing projects, finding themes and books that influenced my novels. )
pjthompson: (Default)
Yes, it does. Especially in the first draft, but sometimes even in the final draft. I have to accept that and move on. There is no perfect thing on earth. Rather than beat myself up for not attaining perfection, I remind myself (on my good days) that we are all striving for enlightenment, and must not cease striving for it, but nirvana does not exist on earth.

And I also realize that if I don't have a crisis at the front end of writing a novel, I will have one in the middle, or at the end. (Please, God, not all three.) It seems to be part of the process.

Night Warrior/Born to Darkness seems the worst of the four I've written, but I wonder if that's colored by not remembering the sturm und drang of the previous experiences? I think the life stress of the year in which I've written it contributed to that feeling, but there were life stressors going on for all of them. It's probably a function of selective memory that this seems worst. I remind myself it took me twelve years of false starts on this novel before I could get it to go. At least the middle went fairly smooth.

Shivery Bones was also a bear to start, had the predictable saggy middle, but my perception is that once I'd passed that, it went well in the last half. Blood Geek went great at the beginning and end, but that middle was soooooo nasty. Heart of Power, my first completed novel, was a real puzzle piece, trying to figure out how to do this for the first time. When I'd finished, I lived for a time under the illusion that I'd finally figured out how to write novels. It wasn't until I tried the next one that I realized each one basically starts at zero. Each time is a different process and has to be figured out in different ways because, hopefully, I'm writing a different book each time with unique problems of its own.

Not what I wanted to realize at the beginning of a project, but there you are. And having realized that, I didn't have quite as big a crisis of faith when it came to novel number three. There were plenty of other crises of faith for me to get over, but . . . it's not a perfect world.


Quote of the day:

"Everybody owned their memories, no matter who was in them. She had a brief vision of the scattering of selves she'd left behind all over the country, snakeskin [selves] in the heads of this person of that, [selves] she had stepped out of but which still held her shape and character."

—Nina Kiriki Hoffman, Past the Size of Dreaming


Ironically, in light of my post of yesterday, this came out of the random quote file today.

In other news: Dr. Dramaqueen last night told me I was lucky. My eye healed completely without any scarring. He was sure I'd have a scar. I'm glad he was wrong. I now have my contacts back and can see again. Huzzah.
pjthompson: (Default)
I love anything that smacks of randomness, so I had to do this meme. In which you post your blog's first line of the first post of each month.

The year in review, as inspired by [livejournal.com profile] merebrilliante and [livejournal.com profile] prestoimp:

Read More )
pjthompson: (Default)
Quote of the day:

"Maybe it's what we don't say / that saves us."

—Dorianne Laux, Enough Music

Writing blah-blah of the day: So I was talking to one of my local betas yesterday about The Novel. "This one's really long," she said.

"It's shorter than Shivery Bones." (Which she also read chapter by chapter, brave girl.)

"You're kidding? It feels longer."

"Hmmm," I said in a worried tone.

"Not in a bad way, just longer. I think it's because of the three timelines."

I think she may be right. And I was also noticing, going over the ms. that the chapter count seems way high because I've got many more fusty little chapters then I did with Shivery Bones. Even at it's bloated first draft word count of 160k there were only 35 chapters. Night Warrior is in the 120k range and it already has 32 chapters.

So starting with chapter 24, I started going through to see where I can combine fusty little chapters into more substantial ones. In fact, 24 and 24, both fusty, combined quite naturally, so I've already eliminated one chapter. Fewer chapters will bring down the word count a bit, too, which is a good thing.

I'll continue going through and checking for combo potential and eventually will do the same with earlier chapters--but probably not in this go round. Finish first, reduce later.

I sure will be glad when I can have my weekends back for writing not moving. Soon. Sooooon.
pjthompson: (Default)
"If, as you live your life, you find yourself mentally composing LJ entries about it, post this exact same sentence in your Live Journal."


But you all knew that about me anyway.

Things I thought of blogging about today: Of how some readers confuse current times with historical times and think current cultural mores are the way things have always been. 

Why I didn't blog it: Bizzy.  I may still blog it.  Or just think about it.

Goofy thought of the day:  I should start a band called the Jimi Schmendrix Experience.

Cliché du jour: I stared open-mouthed at him.

Darling du jour: n/a - Nothing really opened up my third eye.

Gratitude of the day: To those who offered to beta my novelette.  'Preciate skit!

Agony of the day:  Boiling down the two page synopsis for Shivery Bones to one page.  Oh. The. Humanity.

Refrigerator of the day:  In deference to those who have moral standards (unlike myself), I've put this behind a cut.  If [livejournal.com profile] buymeaclue wanders by, the erotic Ancient Greek pot we discussed some months back is right below the green car.

Here There Be Man Parts&

[broken link]
pjthompson: (Default)
Irritation of the day: Coming back to work after a long weekend and finding out they actually expected me to work today! That's rather nervy.

Achievement of the day: As of this evening, the official word count on The Novel is 97,000 words. It's gettin' big, and I still have a ways to go. Some of that is padding, but maybe only 12 pages or so. Still, I might get it done in 125k. I sure hope so. I really don't want to repeat the agony and the ecstasy of Shivery Bones, hacking it down from 160k to 144k. Which was still too long, but the best I could do at the time. I haven't looked at the ms. since it went into an editorial holding pattern. I figure once it's rejected, I'll take another, really fresh look at it before I send it out again.

Typo of note: As of this evening, the official world count on The Novel is 97,000 worlds.
pjthompson: (Default)
Frustration of the day: Netscape won't let me access my flist page. I can access it all right if I use Safari, but none of the click throughs work on Netscape. Which makes no kind of sense! I can click on the individual friend, I've checked all the settings, but I can't click through to the flist page from the entry page or my blog page or the UserInfo page.

Oh, and on Safari, I can get into the flist page, but it's not displaying correctly. And although it says I'm logged in at the top, I still have to log in every time I leave a comment.

Grrr. (This is me looking like that demon-ugly dog.)

Interesting thing of the day: They featured the Magic Castle on one of the local TV programs, an exclusive membership club in Hollywood. I hope to go there for my birthday in September. One of the people I work with is a professional magician and a member there and can get us free passes. But that's some months down the road...

Most ungrammatical news story of the day: On a "Netscape News With CNN" article about Stonehenge: "From where did those bluestones comes?"

Writerly question of the day: Why rewrite The Little Mermaid (Andersen version, not Disney version) when you've covered no new territory, brought no new insights to the table, haven't changed the structure in any way? In fact, the only new element seems to be that this writer set the story in his imaginary, contemporary North American city that he's set so many stories in. I finished the story and thought, "What was the point of that?"

Of course, the whole "covering new territory" issue is one that I run up against quite a bit in my own writing.

Or at least in my current WIP and the last novel that is currently in an editorial holding pattern. I'm told over and over that it's next to impossible to write anything new about vampires; many refuse to read my stuff because they can't believe they'll find anything there for themselves. Yet when people actually do read my stuff they're often surprised, often say, "This is different." Many won't give it a chance, though.

My favorite crit along these lines was: "If I liked vampire books, I'd probably be delighted to read more."

The way I look at it is this: either a book is good or it isn't; either you enjoy reading it or you don't. Even if it's not your usual "type" of book, if you pick it up and enjoy it, why stop reading because it isn't what you usually read? It's impossible to answer that—readers do what they do; people think the way they think.

I've been guilty of it myself, but often when I violate my own reading rules, I find wonderful surprises. The loveliest surprise I've had in recent years is James Hetley's The Summer Country. When I read the blurb some years back I thought, "Not another urban retelling of Celtic myth! Blech." I'd read quite a lot of that and had a prejudice that it would be paint-by-numbers fiction. Then I read a review of the sequel, The Winter Oak, and that made me believe that perhaps there was something different going on with these books. So I bought The Summer Country and I absolutely fell in love with it. Gobbled up The Winter Oak soon after. They were both lovely surprises and now I'll read anything James Hetley puts out, even if it seems like a retelling—because even if some of the elements are familiar territory, he brings a new character gravitas to the table; he makes me see the familiar in a new way.

There's a difference in spirit between a retelling just because you can get away with it and a retelling because your writer's heart has found new value in the material. I think the reader can tell the difference, even if they can't quite put their finger on why one thing works and another doesn't. I hope I'm writing because I've found new value in the material, but I obviously don't have the perspective to judge.

The thing is, I've never perceived my stuff as vampire fiction. My stories are about people trying to cope with a disease that leaves them alienated from the human society that they crave, the love that they need, and with tough moral dilemmas that they try hard to reconcile. They are human beings, not supernatural creatures. They have values (some of them even family values!) and ethics, and try to stay on the side of morality, to show compassion, to weed out the vampires who don't. They are fallible, though, and sometimes fall from grace.

I guess that's been done before, too. But my writer's heart insists there's still value to be had there.

It's frustrating and I wish sometimes the muse hadn't insisted on taking this particular path. I've created other worlds that don't tread such familiar roads, that are not viewed with the same disdain as vampires. But for the moment, this is where my passion lies. To write a novel, I think you've got to have at least some fire in the belly for an idea. At least it's that way for me. It's such a long process that something more than "Gosh, I need to write a novel" has to push me forward. And right now, these characters are providing that burning engine. Other characters and other worlds may catch fire down the line, but for right now, this is what I have to do.

And yes, I'm whining. I'll get over myself soon.
pjthompson: (Default)
So yesterday was a gorgeous day—as was today. Sky so blue you could ride it all the way to Heaven if you had the right kind of boat. I went for a late lunch-early dinner at my favorite cafe, then decided to go for a drive. I wound up driving by Woodlawn Cemetery up on 14th and Pico in Santa Monica.

I hadn't been there in years, but I used to like to walk through the place when I was a tweenie and early teen. Not a huge cemetery, surrounded by urban blight on three of its four sides and a junior college on the fourth. But it's a beautiful place, lots of old and gnarled and interesting trees, and since it was established in 1847 it has a wide range of dates for the headstones. I wasn't a morbid kid, but the place always made me feel peaceful. So I pulled over and decided to do a walk through.

Those of you who read my novel, Shivery Bones, may remember the scene in the cemetery. It was called Woodhaven in the book, on 13th and Pico. It wasn't Woodlawn, exactly, but I'd have to say it was inspired by Woodlawn. Part of my reason for deciding to go there yesterday was to see how my memories stacked up; how the place I created in my book fit the place that is. It didn't exactly, but I think someone could see the inspiration there.

I also wanted to take pictures, but I felt kind of funny about it. Once I was in the place, though, a cop car sped through from one end to the other, a kid did wheelies on his bike along one of the avenues and around the graves, and—because this is L.A.—they were filming a fricking movie there. It looked like an indy or a student film. I think the latter since I saw them arrive in a van and set up. No fricking great trailers choking the road; no Kraft Services.

So I took pictures. Because the sun was so bright, the sky so blue, and the trees so plentiful, I got lots of very evocative shadow and light shots. Lots of poignant stories there in the headstones, too. Mysteries that are nearly a century old. I doubt anyone knows the story behind them anymore, probably not even the folks that keep the cemetery records. But I wandered around and wondered and let my imagination roam.

And when I left I felt just as peaceful as I did in the old days.

When I told my mother about it this afternoon, she told me that my surrogate grandmother was buried there. I had no idea. They didn't let me go to the funeral when I was a kid because they figured I'd be too upset, so I never knew where she was. Maybe I'll go back and take her some flowers.

And last night when I was processing the pictures (I don't recommend processing 95 in one evening), I discovered another little mystery. I like to view all the pictures in super blow up, quadrant by quadrant. Partly that's because sometimes a piece of a photo will be much more interesting than the entire shot; partly because I like to look for anomalies. My favorite shot was a shadow and light shot of a child's grave. And that was the beginning of the mystery:

Donald Laverty

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

In super enlargement, I noticed there was a marble beside this grave, just the other side of the slice of diagonal shadow in the upper right of the picture. Here's the close up (and if anyone can tell me why Graphic Converter has started to digitalize every picture I process with it, I'd be happy to hear it):

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

This marble appealed to my romantic soul and I thought, "I wonder if some little kid or somebody left a marble for the little boy to play with." Then I moved on. And I came to this odd mystery—two tiny graves over by the fence:

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

No dates, no other graves nearby, just these two little headstones. My imagination roamed a lot over that one.

I also did a close up of each headstone:

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

When I was doing the super enlargement of the Brother headstone, I found another marble. This one wasn't as easy to spot because it was pushed down into the mud:

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

So I wondered if someone was going through the cemetery and leaving marbles for all the little kids. I didn't see one near the Baby headstone, but it was much more covered in leaves so it could have been hidden. I didn't move any leaves and stuff when I took pictures because I wanted them to be as I found them. But I still wonder about those marbles, who might be leaving them.

I don't know if anyone's leaving them, of course. Could be coincidence and just my imagination roaming again, but I could certainly understand the impetus to do a little ritual like that. These little graves are sad. They never had a chance to play. Someone with a romantic soul may have wanted to give them something to play with.
pjthompson: (Default)
One person who read my novel, Shivery Bones, said the title made her think of pirates. Ar! I could live with that—if it was the Johnny Depp type of pirate.

Unfortunately, the novel has nothing to do with pirates. It has to do with channeling gods and goddesses; the birth and death cycle of the Great Goddess; love, sacrifice, and redemption; the meaning of lif(e); and good and evil vampires. Oh yes, it's also about the Spanish Inquisition, but nobody expects that.

I'd planned on writing another type of novel after that one. I was writing a series of contemporary fantasy stories about a small, mythological county in Southern California called Dos Lunas and the very strange people who live there. I had a nice superstructure worked out that would allow me to use much of that material in a novel, but somehow that didn't jell and this old novel, Night Warrior, sunk it's fangs into me. I'm closing in on 60k words now on a novel centering around one of the "support players" in Shivery.

And just this morning my subconscious delivered of me a solution as to why the Dos Lunas novel didn't jell. That's the way these breakthroughs happen for me. Distract myself with something else and let the lower end of my brain work on the other stuff and then pop! A squawling mass of new ideas comes forth.

And the conclusion I came to about using the Dos Lunas stories for a novel: those stories are...stories. They were written novelistically (which is why I'm not a great short story writer), but I don't really think they are part of a novel. The superstructure is fine, but the journey my hero, JK, needs to make has to be told in a different way. It has to be a part of this universe and this novel, not those stories. They have turned out to be a very elaborate backstory.

I may still be able to make them work as stories some day, but it isn't a priority for me anymore. I'm a novelist. That's the way my creative mind works; that's the creative muscles that have developed. And JK will have his day. Just not in the way I originally thought.

Of course, my lower brain didn't have any good ideas about what to do with the minor character who wanted to hijack the entire novel. I plan to slip her some sedatives once I start writing that novel again.

The Locals

Dec. 6th, 2004 10:12 am
pjthompson: (Default)
Ah, this is serious.  I've started serializing my new novel to my local readers. Reactions to chapter one have been very positive.  This must mean Night Warrior really is a go. 

None of my locals are writers, which is a cool thing.  I get straight reader reaction from them.  And even if they are my friends, they usually tell me when they think things have gone wrong—quite forcefully at times.  They take this beta reading thing seriously, and their help has been invaluable to me.  I'm lucky to have three such intelligent and engaged readers to filter my first drafts through.  (And none of them read this blog, so that piece of suck up is just because.)

I guess I'll start posting chapters to the 'shop soon.  I want to build up a bit more steam first.  Also, my historical research is ongoing and I'm always reluctant to put the work seriously out there unless I've got the milieu down.  For one thing, all those niggling details are what make a historical setting feel real and I find that if I saturate myself with the details of the past, it's richer, more real to the reader.  Still, I feel like the emotional substratum and the plot of this novel are pretty solid and once I've internalized those two things, integrated them into my psyche, it's almost impossible not to start writing.  I reach a critical mass inside my brain and it must be written down.  Even if the research lags behind.

I also want to get some more crits finished before running this thing through the 'shop.  Most of the crits I'm doing these days are offline—that's how far behind I was.  But it's been a good opportunity to get a little closer to equity.  When I was pumping out a new chapter of Shivery Bones every two weeks, I built up a lot of debt because most of my regulars were not posting as fast as I was.  God Bless you everyone, if you're listening.  I appreciate all your help.

I find it fascinating how different the reactions can be between my non-writer friends and my writer friends.  After the locals have their say, I usually post to my workshop.  Sometimes chapters the locals loved get torn to shreds on the 'shop.  Sometimes just the opposite.  Both sets of input are valuable.  One gives me a "non-technical" reaction, the emotional response; the other helps me with the hard work of turning the writing into a serious piece of craft.  But it's still fascinating when the two camps disagree.

I'm sure there's a profound lesson there somewhere, but I can't quite see it at the moment.  I don't know what it means, if it simply means that different sets of readers have different requirements for fiction.  I suppose it could be tangential to the fanfic discussion that's heating up LJ these days: readers have different needs from writers and editors.  But I wonder if that's true?  All writers and editors start out as readers, after all. 

In terms of the fanfic discussion I can't say as I agree that slash is the wave of the future.  But I do agree that most literary fiction reads like a plotless ramble, while most genre fiction lacks emotional resonance.  Finding books that have both bright, shiny sentences, enthralling plots, and a clear understanding of the way real humans feel things is sometimes tough.  The writers who do it for me are Connie Willis, Kage Baker...There are others, but unfortunately my brain is refusing to work at the moment.  I'm sure I'm forgetting someone Really Obvious.
pjthompson: (Default)
I usually don't post progress notes because it's always the same story with me: I grind it out day to day, averaging between 500-850 words. Not a blistering pace, but steady and cumulative. Sometimes I write 1000, 1200, even 2-3000, but mostly it's just grinding it out. But I thought it worthy to note that I have just completed seven chapters of my new novel, Night Warrior. Okay, most of that was rewriting and editing old text to make it come up to my present standards, but it does mean that I am well and thoroughly launched on this new novel. I'm in the zone with it, can feel it spinning out ahead of me and delving deep inside me.

Pam's lessons learned.

Recurrent themes emerge from the darkness. Scenes involving transformative experiences, for one. In my novel Shivery Bones I had a scene where a wounded and desperate man crawls through a gap in a hedge and emerges into a place that will thoroughly change him. Apparently, my Backbrain liked that scene so much it copied it from this older work, ten years before. I'd completely forgotten I had a scene with a boy who crawls through a gap in a briar patch and has a transformative experience until I read it again. Too bad. I think the metaphor works even better in this one. Are metaphors like rivers, I wonder? Can you wade in the same metaphor twice or must they constantly be changing? I suppose it's failure of imagination to reuse such a distinctive one, but *sigh.*

But the positive thing about revisiting this old work after a flood of water under the bridge is that even the things that made me despair and abandon it all those years ago are just not that big of a deal to me this go round. Perspective. Learning more about the craft. Water under the bridge.

Having completed three novels now (and countless stories) I think it's finally sunk in to my creative spirit (and not just my brain) that first drafts are not a life and death proposition. You don't have to get it right the first time—in fact, that's virtually impossible. The job of the first draft is just to be there, a repository for the things inside yearning to get out. Writers have the great luxury of revisions and levels of approach. Here are my hard won (and not profound) lessons learned:

● First draft—just get it done.

● Second draft—fix those plot holes and character inconsistencies and pacing issues—the big ticket items.

● Third draft—maybe concentrate on the language this time around, make it pretty and bright.

● Fourth draft—no, don't go there, you'll get stuck in the never ending revision cycle.

Send the damned thing out and move on to the next thing. If it comes back to you rejected, you always have the option of doing that fourth draft, but if you have well and truly moved on to something else, your perspective will be so much better when the old thing returns—and you can do a much better job at revising it. And anyway, all your eggs won't be in one basket and it won't hurt as much if one of them breaks. Only like wrenching off one of your fingers instead of the whole limb. (And now I'm mixing my metaphors which has got to be as bad as reusing them.)

Your order of dealing with revisions may be substantially different from mine, but this is what's working for me now. As W. Somerset Maugham said in the blog of [livejournal.com profile] matociquala (as well as elsewhere):

"There are three rules for writing a novel. Unfortunately, no one knows what they are."

Of course, the immortal words of Han Solo are also coming back to me at this moment, too: "Don't get cocky, kid."

On another note: You may recall that the last we heard from Boyfriend and Girlfriend who live upstairs, Boyfriend had filled the back of his truck with dirt which then turned to mud when he drove home in a rain storm and drained all over the garage when he parked it in Girlfriend's parking space. The truck's been there ever since, round about a week and a half I guess, and the mud has dried and turned to stone (lots of clay in local soil). But sometime between 6:45 last night when I got home and 8:30 when I left this morning, someone had moved the truck out of the garage and onto the street. By Imperial order of Yuri? I don't know. And after they moved it, the City of Los Angeles came along and put a boot on the wheel for unpaid parking tickets...

I tried not to laugh too much because that would have been wrong, wouldn't it? I don't need the bad karma. But sometimes, ya know, life is just very funny.
pjthompson: (Default)
As many others have said, "Post your favorite or most intriguing sentence from works in progress."


This self-quoting meme is taken from my novel Shivery Bones, publication forthcoming...if anyone should happen to buy it.  :-)  I am not at all sure this group of sentences works, and I don't think it's my favorite, but this was the most quotable chunk I found in a hurried look through.

#


"Love," Jolene sighed.

The sun was a golden apple sliced in half by the horizon of the sea.  The ocean glittered like sharp knives.  The light of the setting sun shone in a pathway towards the shore, pointing to the hill, straight up the hill to the house, through the center of the yard to the widow's walk at the house's crown where Jolene sat and watched.  On top of the world, removed from it, unable to move from it, caught, held.  Watching.

"Love," she repeated.  "Or just desire?"

#
pjthompson: (Default)
Okay, so I'll probably natter on about Shivery Bones again sometime, but this is my final report on: The Rewrite That Would Not Die 2: The Winnowing.

Chapters completed: All of them!

Revised page count: 586

Revised manual word count: 144,058 (net words cut 983)

Revised Word line count with a zero stuck on the end word count: 143,590 (net words cut 1170)


So, I don't recommend doing two intense rewrites in less than three months, but I kind of wanted to prove to myself I could do it. So I did it. I'm happy I was able to cut 12,000 words. The first draft came in at around 156k, the second around 153k. 144k is still too long but I am done for the moment. Yay for me!

As often happens with me when I've been stressing for a long time (and it wasn't the ms. so much as many other factors in my life right now), I got nailed by a nasty virus last night and am currently dealing with the flu. That sort of scotches my plan to work on the synopsis and first 60 today, but it's probably just my body saying, "It's time to take a break." So I'm going to do a serious veg thing for a couple of days at least.
pjthompson: (Default)
Holy Macaroni—I hit a fervent patch of histrionic saidisms in my manuscript today. It's the big climax thing happening here and lots of emotional baggage coming to the fore—but I mean, really. I had to work those out of my book's system right quick.

You know, I have no ambition to write anything more ambitious than melodrama, but I want it to be the Great American Melodrama, I want it to be good melodrama. So when I hit a patch like this, or those abominable shortcuts last week, I'm grateful that writers get a chance to do it over again.

I want to make the sentences clean and bright, and each cut feels like a victory to me, accomplishing two things at once: making the writing better and bringing the word count down. If both factors aren't present, I don't make the cut (and in fact I've added where clarification was still needed), but when you've got something this big, there's always room for some cutting.

I have a "no strays" rule that I apply to each paragraph: I leave no single word (or even two or three small ones) left by themselves on a line at the end of a paragraph. Nothing below, say, an inch to three-quarters of an inch (the Angry Inch). I can usually find something in each paragraph to bring that stray back up into the fold and have one less line in my story. And the way I look at it, if it's that easy to bring the stray up, there's probably more cut potential left in the manuscript. If I struggle and struggle before I can find a cut that doesn't damage the sentences or the sense—or give up in frustration—then perhaps I'm arriving at the proper word count.

She thundered. :-)

Profile

pjthompson: (Default)
pjthompson

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4 567 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728 293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 12:44 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios